Logo-apb
Adv Pharm Bull. 2019;9(4): 609-618.
doi: 10.15171/apb.2019.070
PMID: 31857965
PMCID: PMC6912180
Scopus ID: 85075819980
  Abstract View: 1244
  PDF Download: 874

Research Article

Assessment of Fractional Factorial Design for the Selection and Screening of Appropriate Components of a Self-nanoemulsifying Drug Delivery System Formulation

Ilham Kuncahyo 1,2 ORCID logo, Syaiful Choiri 3* ORCID logo, Achmad Fudholi 4, Ronny Martien 4 ORCID logo, Abdul Rohman 5* ORCID logo

1 Faculty of Pharmacy, Gadjah Mada University, Sekip Utara, Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281.
2 Department of Pharmaceutical Science, Setia Budi University, Mojosongo, Surakarta, Indonesia 57127.
3 Pharmaceutical Technology and Drug Delivery, Department of Pharmacy, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia 57126.
4 Department of Pharmaceutics, Gadjah Mada University, Sekip Utara, Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281.
5 Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Gadjah Mada University, Sekip Utara, Yogyakarta, Indonesia 55281.
*Corresponding Authors: Email: s.choiri@mipa.uns.ac.id; Email: abdul_kimfar@ugm.ac.id

Abstract

Purpose: Recently, a self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery system (SNEDDS) has shown great improvement in the enhancement of drug bioavailability. The selection of appropriate compositions in the SNEDDS formulation is the fundamental step towards developing a successful formulation. This study sought to evaluate the effectiveness of fractional factorial design (FFD) in the selection and screening of a SNEDDS composition. Furthermore, the most efficient FFD approach would be applied to the selection of SNEDDS components.

Methods: The types of oil, surfactant, co-surfactant, and their concentrations were selected as factors. 26 full factorial design (FD) (64 runs), 26-1 FFD (32 runs), 26-2 FFD (16 runs), and 26-3 FFD (8 runs) were compared to the main effect contributions of each design. Ca-pitavastatin (Ca-PVT) was used as a drug model. Screening parameters, such as transmittance, emulsification time, and drug load, were selected as responses followed by particle size along with zeta potential for optimized formulation.

Results: The results indicated that the patterns of 26 full FD and 26-1 for both main effects and interactions were similar. 26-3 FFD lacked adequate precision when used for screening owing to the limitation of design points. In addition, capryol, Tween 80, and transcutol P were selected to be developed in a SNEDDS formulation with a particle size of 69.7±5.3 nm along with a zeta potential of 33.4±2.1 mV.

Conclusion: Herein, 26-2 FFD was chosen as the most efficient and adequate design for the selection and screening of SNEDDS composition. The optimized formulation fulfilled the requirement of a quality target profile of a nanoemulsion.


First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 1245

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 874

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 29 Apr 2019
Revision: 25 Jul 2019
Accepted: 13 Aug 2019
ePublished: 24 Oct 2019
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)