Logo-apb
Adv Pharm Bull. 2024;14(1): 1-4.
doi: 10.34172/apb.2024.020
  Abstract View: 1272
  PDF Download: 640

Editorial

Diagnosis Unreliability of ChatGPT for Journal Evaluation

Mehdi Dadkhah 1,2* ORCID logo, Marilyn H Oermann 3 ORCID logo, Mihály Hegedüs 4 ORCID logo, Raghu Raman 5, Lóránt Dénes Dávid 6,7 ORCID logo

1 Amrita School of Engineering, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amritapuri, Kerala, India.
2 Technology Forecasting Department, SnowaTec Technology Center and Innovation Factory, Entekhab Industrial Group, Isfahan, Iran.
3 School of Nursing, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
4 Tomori Pál College, Chamber of Hungarian Auditors, Budapest, Hungary.
5 Amrita School of Business, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Amritapuri, Kerala, India.
6 Faculty of Economics and Business, John von Neumann University, Kecskemét, Hungary.
7 Institute of Rural Development and Sustainable Economy, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gödöllő, Hungary.
*Corresponding Author: Mehdi Dadkhah, Email: d_mehdi@av.amrita.edu, Email: mehdidadkhah@mail.um.ac.ir

Abstract

Purpose: Academic and other researchers have limited tools with which to address the current proliferation of predatory and hijacked journals. These journals can have negative effects on science, research funding, and the dissemination of information. As most predatory and hijacked journals are not error free, this study used ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence (AI) technology tool, to conduct an evaluation of journal quality.

Methods: Predatory and hijacked journals were analyzed for reliability using ChatGPT, and the reliability of result have been discussed.

Results: It shows that ChatGPT is an unreliable tool for journal quality evaluation for both hijacked and predatory journals.

Conclusion: To show how to address this gap, an early trial version of Journal Checker Chatbot has been developed and is discussed as an alternative chatbot that can assist researchers in detecting hijacked journals.

First Name
 
Last Name
 
Email Address
 
Comments
 
Security code


Abstract View: 1273

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 640

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

Submitted: 21 Sep 2023
Accepted: 10 Oct 2023
ePublished: 14 Oct 2023
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)