Logo-apb
Submitted: 07 Oct 2024
Revision: 31 May 2025
Accepted: 01 Jun 2025
ePublished: 03 Jun 2025
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

Adv Pharm Bull. Inpress.
doi: 10.34172/apb.025.43852
  Abstract View: 18

Short Communication

Assessing the potential of generative Artificial Intelligence models to assist experts in the development of pharmacokinetic models

Sergio Sánchez Herrero* ORCID logo, Laura Calvet Liñan* ORCID logo
*Corresponding Authors: Email: ssanchezherre@uoc.edu; Email: laura.calvet.linan@uab.cat

Abstract

Purpose: This study explores the potential of generative AI models to aid experts in developing scripts for pharmacokinetic (PK) models, with a focus on constructing a two-compartment population PK model using data from Hosseini et al. (2018). Methods: Generative AI tools ChatGPT v3.5, Gemini v2.0 Flash and Microsoft Copilot free could help pharmacokinetics professionals— even those without programming experience—learn the programming languages and skills needed for PK modeling. To evaluate these free AI tools, PK models were created in R Studio, covering key tasks in pharmacometrics and clinical pharmacology, including model descriptions, input requirements, results, and code generation, with a focus on reproducibility. Results: ChatGPT demonstrated superior performance compared to Copilot and Gemini, highlighting strong foundational knowledge, advanced concepts, and practical skills, including PK code structure and syntax. Validation indicated high accuracy in estimated and simulated plots, with minimal differences in clearance (Cl) and volume of distribution (V c and V p) compared to reference values. The metrics showed absolute fractional error (AFE), absolute average fractional error (AAFE), and mean percentage error (MPE) values of 0.99, 1.14, and -1.85, respectively. Conclusion: These results show that generative AI can effectively extract PK data from literature, build population PK models in R, and create interactive Shiny apps for visualization, with expert support.
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 16

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 0

Your browser does not support the canvas element.