Logo-apb
Submitted: 09 Jul 2025
Revision: 15 Nov 2025
Accepted: 20 Dec 2025
ePublished: 23 Dec 2025
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

Adv Pharm Bull. Inpress.
doi: 10.34172/apb.025.45993
  Abstract View: 12

Systematic Review

Pharmacological therapies for bowel dysfunction after colorectal cancer surgery: a systematic review

Alimohammad Bananzadeh ORCID logo, Seyed Matin Emami, Seyed Mohammad Kazem Tadayon, Neda Najib Pour, Sara Shojaei-Zarghani* ORCID logo, Seyed Vahid Hosseini
*Corresponding Author: Email: shojaeisara@ymail.com

Abstract

Purpose: Bowel dysfunction frequently occurs in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients following sphincter-preserving surgeries. This review systematically evaluated the evidence on pharmacological therapies for this complication. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus in November 2024. Experimental or quasi-experimental studies examining the effects of conventional pharmacological therapies and herbal medicine on stable CRC patients with post-surgical bowel dysfunction were included. Results: Among 8,989 retrieved records, eight studies were eligible. These investigated the effects of serotonin type 3 receptor antagonists (n=3), herbal medicines (n=2, specifically Daikenchuto and modified Baizhu Shaoyao San), diazepam (n=1), Botulinum A toxin injection (n=1), and topical phenylephrine (n=1). Except for phenylephrine, interventions showed varying improvements in stool frequency, incontinence, urgency, or quality of life. Most of the included studies exhibited a high risk of bias. Conclusion: Some interventions appear promising; however, the current evidence is insufficient to guide clinical practice. This review highlights a significant evidence gap and underscores the urgent need for large-scale, rigorous randomized controlled trials to establish definitive therapeutic strategies for this debilitating condition.
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 12

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 0

Your browser does not support the canvas element.