Research Article

Combination Therapy of Metadichol Nanogel and Lipocalin-2 Engineered Mesenchymal Stem Cells Improve Wound Healing in Rat Model of Excision Injury

Introduction

Skin is the largest organ of the body that protects it against mechanical and chemical insults. Furthermore, it provides innate and adaptive immune defenses and thermal regulation. It also plays important role in vitamin D synthesis and acts as a sensory organ. ¹ Skin injuries such as excisional wounds, diabetic wounds, bedsores, trauma, and burns are serious health problems that not only result in loss of all or parts of the skin and other tissues, but also could damage the defense barrier and lead to infection. ^2-4 Although some current therapeutic modalities for skin injuries (e.g. surgery and injectable dermal fillers) are useful to accelerate wound healing, they are often painful, and in most cases inefficient and unstable. Recently, some modalities such as mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), gene therapy, and tissue engineering have been proposed for the treatment of cutaneous skin injuries. ^5-10 MSCs are capable of self-renewing, homing, tissue repair and regeneration, releasing trophic factors, promoting neovascularization, managing oxidative stress, and triggering anti-inflammatory responses. ^11-14 However, despite the mentioned advantages, MSCs-based therapy has some limitations including inadequate proliferation, limited post-transplantation viability, and gradual loss of their original characteristics during proliferation in a laboratory settings, as well as induction of apoptosis and cell death. In addition, the toxic and inflammatory microenvironment in recipient tissue is not in favor of the MSCs survival. It has been shown that over 99% of MSCs die within a few days post-transplantation. ^15,16 The major cause of this low survival rate is the inevitable exposure of the cells to a variety of stresses during preparation and following transplantation, including a nutrient-poor environment, oxidative stress, hypoxia, and high amount of cytotoxic factors. ¹⁷ Hence, development of safe and efficient strategies in this regard has been under the focus of investigations and various strategies have been proposed to address the issue. Pre-treatment and/or preconditioning of MSCs with some growth factors and cytokines, H2O2, hypoxia, serum deprivation, and genetic engineering of MSCs by cytoprotective factors are examples of the strategies. ⁶ Furthermore, arming MSCs with cytoprotective factors and/or natural substances harboring potential anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory properties would be one of the strategies to address the challenges. ^18,19 Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) is a 25-kDa protein that belongs to the Lipocalin superfamily. Lipocalin 2 (Lcn2) is highly expressed in many cell types in response to a variety of stresses including oxidative stresses and inflammation, which are well-known stimuli in skin injury. Although the precise role of Lcn2 remains to be determined, as a well-known cytoprotective factor it has a variety of functions including anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant, and anti-bacterial properties. ^20-23

Recently, a new natural product (NP) named Metadichol was designated a “generally recognized as safe (GRAS)” substance by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). ²⁴ Metadichol is a nano-formulation of long-chain lipid alcohols (policosanol) derived from a variety of sources including wheat, rice, distillers grains, sugar cane, grape, sorghum, apples, and peanuts. ^25-29 It is an inverse agonist of vitamin D receptor (VDR), aryl hydrocarbon receptor, and ROR gamma nuclear receptor which their beneficial effects in skin disorders have been shown previously. ²⁴ Interestingly, it has been also reported that Metadichol has anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. ³⁰

Considering the limitation of MSCs-based therapy and also the positive effects of Metadichol on wound healing, this study was conducted to explore the therapeutic potential of a novel modality including combined topical application of Metadichol and administration of Lcn2 engineered MSCs in a rat model of excision injury. Here we used a commercially available Metadichol® nanogel to mimic a wound dressing hydrogel which provides moisture and absorbs exudate. As we report here, the combination therapy exhibited improved wound healing capability compared to controls. Our findings suggest that the combination therapy might be considered as a novel therapeutic strategy for wound healing.

Materials and Methods

MSCs isolation and culture

Human umbilical cord MSCs (hUC-MSCs) were isolated as previously described. ⁵ The cells were cultured in DMEM low glucose and 10% FBS at 37°C and 5% CO₂ (All the materials purchased from Gibco, Germany).

Overexpression of Lcn2 in hUC-MSCs

hUC-MSCs were transfected with 3 μg/mL of either the pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP-Lcn2 (Lcn2-MSCs) or the pcDNA3.1/CT-GFP empty vector (V-MSCs) using X-tremeGENE HP DNA transfection kit (Roche, Germany) according to the manufacturers’ protocol and as described previously. ³¹

RNA extraction and RT-PCR analysis of the Lcn2 mRNA expression

Total RNA of the transfected cells was extracted by TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and quantified using NanoDrop ND-1000 (NanoDrop, USA) spectrophotometer. Next, 2 μg of the extracted RNA was used for cDNA synthesis using SuperScript VILO cDNA Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed by a T100^TM Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad, USA). PCR condition included a primary denaturation step at 95°C for 5 minutes, followed by 35 cycles of PCR (95°C for 30 seconds, 57°C for 30 seconds, and 72°C 30 seconds), and a final step at 72°C for 5 minutes. Lcn2 primer pair included forward: 5′-TCACCTCCGTCCTGTTTAGG-3′ and reverse 5′-CGAAGTCAGCTCCTTGGTTC3′. Β-actin was considered as an internal control and amplified using a primer pair including forward: 5′-TTCTACAATGAGCTGCGTGTGC-3′ and reverse 5′-GTGTTGAAGGTCTCAAACATGAT-3′. All primers were designed by Primer 3 software and synthesized by Bioneer Company (South Korea). PCR products were electrophoresed on 2% agarose gel.

Assessment of the Lcn2 protein expression

Expression of LCN2 at protein level was measured by an ELISA kit (R&D Systems, USA). Concisely, 48 hours post-transfection, the cell culture medium of the Lcn2-MSCs and V-MSCs was collected, centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 5 minutes to remove cells and debris, and used for measurement of the Lcn2 content.

In vivo tracking of hUC-MSCs by CellTracker^TM CM-Dil

The hUC-MSCs were detached by trypsin-EDTA solution and pelleted by centrifugation at 1500 rpm. Then, 1×106 of the cells were resuspended in 1µg/mL of CellTracker^TM CM-Dil dye (Thermo Fisher Scientific, US) and incubated at 37°C, 5% CO2 and 90% humidity for 5 minutes, followed by incubation at 4°C for 15 minutes. The cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and finally resuspended in 150 µL PBS for direct injection into the periphery of the excision wound. The animals were sacrificed 4 and 7 days after the injection and the skin was removed for tissue processing. Briefly, following fixation in 10% formaldehyde, the tissues were paraffin-embedded and 3 µm sections were prepared by manual microtome. The sections were deparaffinized and stained by 1 µg/mL DAPI (Sigma, USA) for nuclear staining. Finally, the transplanted cells were tracked under a fluorescent microscope (Nikon, Japan).

Animal study

Seventy-two male Wistar rats weighing 200-220 g were used in the present study. All animal handlings and protocols were approved by the Guilan University of Medical Sciences ethical committee for animal studies. The animals were kept in a standard animal house with ambient temperature around 20-22°C, 12 hours/12 hours dark/light cycles, and free access to food and water.

Excisional wound model

The rats were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of Ketamine (Alfasan, Netherlands) (70 mg/kg) and xylazine (Alfasan, Netherlands) (7 mg/kg). The dorsal skin of the animals was shaved and disinfected with 70% ethanol. Next, a full-thickness excisional wound (1.5 cm diameter) was made on the skin using a sterile surgical punch. Then, 150 µL of the cell suspension was subcutaneously injected at four points which were 3 mm away from the wound edge. Simultaneously, 0.4 g Metadichol nanogel (Generation100 Company, Switzerland) was applied to the wound and covered by a transparent wound dressing (Comfeel®, Coloplast, Denmark) to prevent infections. A circular ring was sutured around the wound to inhibit panniculus carnosus muscle contraction. The animals were divided to 6 groups (n = 3) including control (Ctrl; the rats with excision wound without any treatment), Metadichol (Met; the rats with excision wound that received Metadichol) V-MSCs (V-MSC; the rats with excision wound that received the V-MSCs ), Lcn2-MSCs ( Lcn2-MSC; the rats with excision wound that received the Lcn2-MSCs), V-MSCs and Metadichol (Met+V-MSCs; The rats which received both topical Metadichol and V-MSCs injection), Lcn2-MSCs and Metadichol (Met+Lcn2-MSCs; The rats which received both topical Metadichol and Lcn2-MSCs injection).

Measurement of wound healing

Wound area was photographed at 0, 4, 7, 14, and 21 days after surgery, and their healing rate was measured by ImageJ software (NIH, USA, version 1.8.0-112). The percentage of wound closure was calculated using the following formula:

Histopathological studies

The rats were sacrificed by an overdose of ketamine/xylazine. The wound area and its adjacent normal skin were removed 4, 7, 14, and 21 days after surgery and fixed in 10% formaldehyde at least for 72h, and then dehydrated through a series of graded ethanol (70%, 90%, 96% and 100%). Then, the tissues were paraffin-embedded and 5 µm sections were obtained by manual microtome. Next, the slides were stained with hematoxylin and eosin dyes according to routine laboratory protocols. In addition, the formation and arrangement of collagen fibers were evaluated by Masson’s trichrome staining of different groups 14, and 21 days after surgery.

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed by GraphPad Prism software version 8.0.2 (NIH, USA). Wound closure was analyzed using the linear regression method. In addition, the t test, two-way ANOVA, and Tukey’s post hoc for multiple comparisons test were used. The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to examine the normal distribution of the data. Furthermore, One-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis statistical tests were used to analyze the results, and P < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Overexpression of Lcn2 in hUC-MSCs

Overexpression of Lcn2 at mRNA and protein levels were verified by RT-PCR and ELISA, respectively. A sharp band of 242 bp on the 2% agarose gel was detected in the Lcn2-MSCs, while a faint band was noticed in the V-MSCs (). Overexpression of Lcn2 protein by the Lcn2-MSCs was confirmed while the expression amount was low in the V-MSCs) ().

Close

Figure 1. Evaluation of Lcn2 overexpression at mRNA and protein levels. (A) RT-PCR was performed to evaluate the expression of Lcn2 mRNA. Detection of a single band of 242 bp in the Lcn2-MSCs group and weak PCR product in V-MSCs indicated successful expression of Lcn2. Expression of β-actin was used as an internal control. Lane 1 = β-actin of V-MSCs, lane 2 = β-actin of Lcn2-MSCs, lane 3 = Lcn2 of V-MSCs, lane 4 = Lcn2 of Lcn2-MSCs). (B) ELISA was performed to assess Lcn2 at the protein level. The culture medium of V-MSCs and Lcn2-MSCs were harvested 48 h after transfection. The Lcn2 protein expression was significantly (P < 0.0001) higher in Lcn2-MSCs compared to the V-MSCs. **** P < 0.0001, (Number of replicates = 4).

Metadichol increased the hUC-MSCs survival following their transplantation to the wound

To track the hUC-MSCs following transplantation, they were first labeled by CellTracker^TM CM-Dil and then administered to the animals. As it is represented by , the presence of the labeled hUC-MSCs in the wound area was confirmed on days 4 and 7 post-transplantation in the hUC-MSCs and hUC-MSCs+Met groups. In addition, the number of the cells in the hUC-MSCs+Met group was significantly (P < 0.001) higher than the hUC-MSCs on day 4. Furthermore, although the number of the cells in both groups gradually decreased within one week, it was still significantly (P < 0.001) higher in the hUC-MSCs+Met group ().

Close

Figure 2. In vivo tracking of the hUC-MSCs in excision wound 4 and 7 days after transplantation. The cells were labeled by CellTrackerTM CM-Dil before transplantation. (A), Higher numbers of red-stained cells were identified in the hUC-MSCs+Met group comparing to the hUC-MSCs group. In addition, the cells’ nuclei were stained by DAPI and the photographs were merged. the hUC-MSCs group received the labeled cells, the hUC-MSCs+Met group received the labeled cells and Metadichol as well (B), The percentage of the CellTrackerTM CM-Dil labeled hUC-MSCs in wound area on 4th and 7th days post-transplantation. The hUC-MSCs group received the labeled cells, the hUC-MSCs+Met group received the labeled cells, and Metadichol as well; ***P ≤ 0.0001. Number of replicates = 3.

Combination therapy of Metadichol and Lcn2-MSCs effectively improved wound healing macroscopically

The wound contraction area was photographed to evaluate its healing and closure on days 0, 4, 7, 14, and 21. The process of wound healing in macroscopic view and its repair rate is represented by and , respectively. The first progress in wound healing was observed on day 7, in which the Lcn2-MSC, Met+V-MSC, and Met+Lcn2-MSC groups showed more contraction compared to the other groups. In addition, a great progress in wound healing and contraction occurred from days 7 to 14 in the treatment groups. On day 14, 90% of the wound area was healed and closed in the Met+V-MSC and Met+Lcn2-MSC groups. It is noteworthy that on day 21, wound contraction was more than 90% in all groups except control, however, the Met, Lcn2-MSC, Met+V-MSC, and Met+Lcn2-MSC groups showed nearly 100% wound closure (). In addition, the control group showed the lowest contraction rate among all groups at this time point. Overall, wound healing was prominent in the Met+Lcn2-MSC group for 21 days (). Moreover, the wound area contraction rate was measured by Image J software and the results are represented by . According to , the wound closure rates were not significantly different among the experimental groups. However, all groups showed a higher rate of wound closure when compared to the control group (P < 0.001). Of note, the wound area size in the Met+Lcn2-MSC group was significantly smaller than the other groups from day 7 to 21 (P < 0.001). It is worth mentioning that the wound healing rate was significantly higher in the Met+ Lcn2-MSC group (P < 0.001).

Close

Figure 3. Photographs of wound contraction at different time points after excisional wound model in different groups. Control (Ctrl; the rats with excision wound without any treatment), Metadichol (Met; the rats with excision wound that received Metadichol), V-MSCs (V-MSC; the rats with excision wound that received the V-MSCs ), Lcn2-MSCs ( Lcn2-MSC; the rats with excision wound that received the Lcn2-MSCs), V-MSCs and Metadichol (Met+V-MSC; The rats which received both topical Metadichol and V-MSCs injection), Lcn2-MSCs and Metadichol (Met+Lcn2-MSC; The rats which received both topical Metadichol and Lcn2-MSCs injection).

Close

Figure 4. Wound healing rate in different groups, illustrated as linear regression and wound repair comparison among groups. (A) Linear regression analysis of wound healing rates. The slope of each line expresses the wound healing extent. (B) Wound contraction rate in different groups using ANOVA test. Control (Ctrl; the rats with excision wound without any treatment), Metadichol (Met; the rats with excision wound that received Metadichol), V-MSCs (V-MSC; the rats with excision wound that received the V-MSCs ), Lcn2-MSCs ( Lcn2-MSC; the rats with excision wound that received the Lcn2-MSCs), V-MSCs and Metadichol (Met+V-MSC; The rats which received both topical Metadichol and V-MSCs injection), Lcn2-MSCs and Metadichol (Met+Lcn2-MSC; The rats which received both topical Metadichol and Lcn2-MSCs injection) *** P < 0.001, ** P < 0. 01. Number of replications = at least 3.

Combination therapy of Metadichol and Lcn2-MSCs improved wound healing histologically

Furthermore, the wound and its normal adjacent tissue were stained by hematoxylin and eosin at 4, 7, 14, and 21 days after surgery ( and ). In addition, the collagen architecture was evaluated by Masson’s trichrome staining (). As it is shown by , a large number of inflammatory cells were seen 4 days after surgery in the wound area, however, no significant difference was observed among the groups. In addition, hemorrhagic lesions were observed more in the control group. Furthermore, angiogenesis and a large number of vessels were observed in the Met+V-MSC, Met+Lcn2-MSC, and Lcn2-MSC groups. Of note, partial epithelization was detected 7 days after surgery in Lcn2-MSC, Met+V-MSC, and Met+V-MSC groups ().

Close

Figure 5. Photomicrographs of wound area histomorphology stained by hematoxylin-eosin 4 and 7 days after wound creation. Neovascularization (red arrows) in Met+Lcn2-MSC was higher than that in other groups on days 4 and 7. Of note, partial epithelization was detected 7 days after surgery in Met+Lcn2-MSC, Met+V-MSC, and Lcn2-MSC groups (yellow dots). Images are represented with 10x magnification. Control (Ctrl; the rats with excision wound without any treatment), Metadichol (Met; the rats with excision wound that received Metadichol), V-MSCs (V-MSC; the rats with excision wound that received the V-MSCs ), Lcn2-MSCs ( Lcn2-MSC; the rats with excision wound that received the Lcn2-MSCs), V-MSCs and Metadichol (Met+V-MSC; The rats which received both topical Metadichol and V-MSCs injection), Lcn2-MSCs and Metadichol (Met+Lcn2-MSC; The rats which received both topical Metadichol and Lcn2-MSCs injection) Scale bar = 200 μm.

Close

Figure 6. Photomicrographs of wound area histomorphology stained by hematoxylin-eosin 14 and 21 days after wound creation. Skin appendages like sebaceous glands were only detected In Met+ Lcn2-MSC and Met+V-MSC groups on days 14 and 21. Images are represented with 10x magnification. Control (Ctrl; the rats with excision wound without any treatment), Metadichol (Met; the rats with excision wound that received Metadichol), V-MSCs (V-MSC; the rats with excision wound that received the V-MSCs ), Lcn2-MSCs ( Lcn2-MSC; the rats with excision wound that received the Lcn2-MSCs), V-MSCs and Metadichol (Met+V-MSC; The rats which received both topical Metadichol and V-MSCs injection), Lcn2-MSCs and Metadichol (Met+Lcn2-MSC; The rats which received both topical Metadichol and Lcn2-MSCs injection). Scale bar = 200 μm.

Our finding revealed that the configuration of the wound area was histologically different between the two-time points of 4 and 7 days post-surgery. It is noteworthy that granulation tissue with a dense and compact cell population clearly formed in all groups. However, the nucleation density was higher in the Met+Lcn2-MSC and Met+V-MSC groups. Furthermore, although the formation of the epithelium was thin, incomplete, and discontinuous in all groups, however, it was slightly well-differentiated and organized in Met, Met+V-MSC, and Met+ Lcn2-MSC groups. Moreover, a high rate of angiogenesis was still present in all groups, especially in the Met +Lcn2-MSC group. It is worth mentioning that granulation tissue and cell density were still observable in the dermis, though with a slight decrease, in most groups on day 14 (). However, the Met+Lcn2-MSC group represented minimal cell density and normal histological configuration resembling healthy tissue. In addition, the quality of the epithelium was higher in all experimental groups compared to the control. In the control group, the epithelium was thicker and not well organized with vacuolated and larger keratinocytes. In addition, the skin appendage including sweat glands and hair follicles were seen in Met+Lcn2-MSC and Met+V-MSC groups. On day 21, a decrease in granulation tissue, cell population, and density were the prominent features in all groups. Interestingly, immature sweat glands and hair follicles were formed in Met+Lcn2-MSC, Met+V-MSC, V-MSC, and Lcn2-MSC groups as well ().

The collagen architecture in wound tissue on day 14 is represented by . As it is shown, the Met+Lcn2-MSC, Met and Met+V-MSC groups had denser, thicker, and more regular collagen fibers than the control group. In addition, the Met+Lcn2-MSC group showed the highest collagen quality in terms of thickness, organization, and density compared to all other groups. Furthermore, 21 days after surgery, the formation, and organization of collagen fibers were more compact at the edges of the wound, and from the margin of the wound to its center. Collagen was distributed uniformly throughout the wound in a thick and dense form and almost parallel to the wound area, with a regular distribution, especially in the Met+Lcn2-MSC group. In addition, the quality of collagen arrangement was higher in the Met+V-MSC and Met groups compared to the control.

Close

Figure 7. Photomicrographs of collagen arrangement assessed by Masson's trichrome staining 14 and 21 days after excisional wound creation. The collagen tissue was denser and more mature in all groups except the control group. In addition, collagen fibers have been distributed more regularly and densely throughout the wound area in the Met+Lcn2-MSC and Met+V-MSC groups on day 21. Collagen arrangement in Met+Lcn2-MSC and Met+V-MSC groups represented the highest quality and was well-designed compared to other groups. In the control group, non-uniform and irregular collagen thickness was observed. Control (Ctrl; the rats with excision wound without any treatment), Metadichol (Met; the rats with excision wound that received Metadichol), V-MSCs (V-MSC; the rats with excision wound that received the V-MSCs ), Lcn2-MSCs ( Lcn2-MSC; the rats with excision wound that received the Lcn2-MSCs), V-MSCs and Metadichol (Met+V-MSC; The rats which received both topical Metadichol and V-MSCs injection), Lcn2-MSCs and Metadichol (Met+Lcn2-MSC; The rats which received both topical Metadichol and Lcn2-MSCs injection) Scale bar = 100 μm.

Discussion

Skin injuries including excisional wounds are amongst public health problems with a high annual death toll. ³² In this study, a multidisciplinary approach was employed for the treatment of wound healing in the rat model. We found that combination therapy by Lcn2-MSCs transplantation and Metadichol nanogel application accelerates wound healing in a wound excision rat model. Although the UC-MSCs transplantation has been shown to promote wound healing in previous studies, there have been few reports on its healing effect on excisional wounds. ^33,34 In the current study, we found that the number of transplanted UC-MSCs in wound tissues decreased gradually over time. This might be due to the harsh microenvironment of the excision injury. Supporting this notion, the toxic microenvironment of the recipient host, mainly due to inflammation and oxidative stress, showed to make an unfavorable microenvironment for MSCs to survive, and thereby, resulted in decreased viable cells and limited the capacity of the cell to exert their therapeutic effects within first days of the transplantation. ^35,36 Within our assumption, when we administered Metadichol nanogel and hUC-MSCs together, our results revealed that the number of the viable cells that were positive for CM-DIL were higher in the hUC-MSCs+Met group compared to the hUC-MSCs group suggesting that Metadichol might reduce the toxicity of the environment by its anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative functions which enhances the efficiency of MSCs-based therapy. ^{25,26,28,35,36} This might arise the fact that Metadichol, as an inverse agonist of vitamin D3, could mitigate the harsh microenvironment by its anti-oxidant and anti-inflammatory properties, therefore, the transplanted MSCs would survive longer. ²⁴ It has been reported that vitamin D3 is able to suppress Th-1 cell proliferation that in turn decreases the production of gamma interferon and interleukin-2. Furthermore, it has been well-known that vitamin D3 suppresses the production of IL-17 via the direct reduction in IL-17 gene transcription. ^24-26,29,30 Vitamin D3 also upregulates the expression of Th-2-associated cytokines such as interleukin-4 and interleukin-10. Overall, vitamin D3 regulates and switches the Th-1 responses toward Th-2 ones. However, the precise mechanisms underlying Metadichol effect on alleviating the unfavorable microenvironment for MSCs to survive after transplantation remains to be studied in the future.

In this study, we also found that the combination therapy resulted in an approximately normal histological configuration in skin resembling healthy tissue. ^37,38 Angiogenesis is an important factor especially in the early stages of wound healing which helps in proper nutritional support and removal of toxic substances. ³⁹ The rate of vessel formation is high in the early stages of wound healing, but is reduced at the final stages. Interestingly, it was clearly evident that the number of vessels was low in the Lcn2-MSC+Met group 21 days after wound creation. In addition, the re-epithelialization in the Lcn2-MSC+Met group was well organized. Lack of formation of skin appendices such as sweat glands and hair follicles is a major problem in the wound healing process. However, in our study, sweat glands and hair follicles were observed following combination therapy, particularly in the Lcn2-MSC+Met group.

The results of a recent study conducted by Dong et al reported that injectable and tunable gelatin hydrogels increased murine adipose‐derived stem cells (AD-MSCs) retention and enhance cutaneous wound healing in the rat. ⁴⁰

Based on their findings, complete wound closure lasted 28 days, whereas, in our study, it took 14 days for a complete wound closure to accomplish. In addition, Xu et al designed an injectable hydrogel system of hyperbranched multi-acrylated poly (ethylene glycol) macromers (HP-PEGs) and thiolated hyaluronic acid, as cell retention and delivery platform. Next, they tested the efficacy of the adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSCs) embedded hydrogels for the treatment of diabetic wounds in a murine animal model. They revealed that angiogenesis was increased and the re-epithelialization was enhanced that supports our findings. Moreover, they reported the inhibition of inflammation after combination therapy in diabetic wound injury. ⁴¹

Overexpressing cytoprotective factors and/or genes implicated in regeneration potential of skin in MSCs such as c-JUN, VEGF, PHD2, Wnt7a, LL37, and TGFβ3 have been reported previously. ^42-44

More recently, Yue et al overexpressed or silenced c-Jun in hUC-MSCs and investigated the therapeutic effects of engineered hUC-MSCs on wound healing in a diabetic rat model. They revealed that in situ subcutaneous injection of c-Jun-overexpressing hUC-MSCs increased angiogenesis and re-epithelialization, accelerated wound healing, and upregulated hepatocyte growth factor and platelet derived growth factor A protein expression in wound tissues. Despite the promising regenerative capability of the c-Jun-overexpressing hUC-MSCs, genetic manipulation of cells using viral vectors is challenging. ⁴⁵

In the current study, we overexpressed Lcn2 in UC-MSCs and with Metadichol nanogel co-applied on a wound to improve the wound healing rate. Harder and Schröder reported that NGAL/Lcn2 expression is low in healthy skin but is increased in diseases such as psoriasis due to inflammatory conditions. ⁴⁶

Lcn2 may facilitate macrophage polarization toward the M2 phenotype and improve impaired angiogenesis in wound inflammatory conditions. However, the precise role of Lcn2 in skin regeneration has not been fully understood yet and warrants further studies. ^47,48

One of the main critical processes in wound healing is re-epithelization. It is suggested that Lcn2 has a fundamental role in the migration of the epithelial cells in wound repair. Qi Miao reported that Lcn2 acts as the key secreted factor downstream of Tcf3. Furthermore, their findings revealed that Lcn2 enhanced cells migration toward wound and accelerated wound repair. ²³

In addition, it has been suggested that Lcn2 could improve cells migration via binding to and activation of the matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9).

In another study conducted by Wlian et al, the regenerative potential of a lipocalin-derived molecule was evaluated in wound healing. They revealed that this molecule plays role in wound healing via fibroblast modulation and extracellular matrix remodeling. It was suggested that this peptide increases the activity of matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2) which results in cell migration and re-epithelization. It has been proven that MMP2 has a fundamental role in wound healing through tissue remodeling, extracellular matrix quality, migration, and adhesion molecules. Hopefully, lipocalin-derived peptide might be considered as a pharmaceutical agent in wound healing. ⁴⁹ Metadichol has also been used to treat other types of diseases, such as chronic kidney disease, and cancer, and heart diseases. ^25-27,29,49 Raghavan et al reported that administration of Metadichol in patients suffering from chronic kidney diseases with high levels of red cell distribution width resulted in improvement of a variety of biomarkers such as red cell distribution width, indicating the effectiveness of Metadichol. ³⁰

Conclusion

In an attempt to improve the MSCs-based therapy for wound healing, we employed a novel modality by combining topical application of Metadichol and administration of Lcn2 engineered MSCs. Our results revealed that Metadichol nanogel increases the MSCs survival after transplantation, which could be due to anti-oxidative and anti-inflammatory properties of Metadichol. Lcn2 might also render anti-oxidant, anti-bacterial, anti-apoptotic, and anti-inflammatory properties which makes the MSCs to be refractory to the unfavorable microenvironment of the injured skin. Our findings also showed that the combination therapy improved and accelerated the wound healing process and resulted in well-organized epithelization, enhanced formation of skin appendices such as hair follicles and sweat glands, and improved arrangement of collagen. Although further preclinical and clinical trials are required in this regard, our findings suggest that the combination therapy might be considered as a novel potential therapeutic strategy for wound healing.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the research deputy of Guilan University of Medical Sciences (Grant number; IR.GUMS.REC.1397.299).

Ethical Issues

All experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at Guilan University of Medical Sciences.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

1. Chuong CM, Nickoloff BJ, Elias PM, Goldsmith LA, Macher E, Maderson PA. What is the ‘true’ function of skin?. Exp Dermatol 2002; 11(2):159-87. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0625.2002.00112.x [Crossref]
2. Kirsner RS, Eaglstein WH. The wound healing process. Dermatol Clin 1993; 11(4):629-40. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8635(18)30216-x [Crossref]
3. Metcalfe AD, Ferguson MW. Tissue engineering of replacement skin: the crossroads of biomaterials, wound healing, embryonic development, stem cells and regeneration. J R Soc Interface 2007; 4(14):413-37. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2006.0179 [Crossref]
4. Schultz GS, Sibbald RG, Falanga V, Ayello EA, Dowsett C, Harding K. Wound bed preparation: a systematic approach to wound management. Wound Repair Regen 2003; 11 Suppl 1:S1-28. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.11.s2.1.x [Crossref]
5. Amiri F, Halabian R, Salimian M, Shokrgozar MA, Soleimani M, Jahanian-Najafabadi A. Induction of multipotency in umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells cultivated under suspension conditions. Cell Stress Chaperones 2014; 19(5):657-66. doi: 10.1007/s12192-014-0491-x [Crossref]
6. Amiri F, Jahanian-Najafabadi A, Habibi Roudkenar M. In vitro augmentation of mesenchymal stem cells viability in stressful microenvironments: in vitro augmentation of mesenchymal stem cells viability. Cell Stress Chaperones 2015; 20(2):237-51. doi: 10.1007/s12192-014-0560-1 [Crossref]
7. Dominici M, Le Blanc K, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini F, Krause D. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy 2006; 8(4):315-7. doi: 10.1080/14653240600855905 [Crossref]
8. Jayaraman P, Nathan P, Vasanthan P, Musa S, Govindasamy V. Stem cells conditioned medium: a new approach to skin wound healing management. Cell Biol Int 2013; 37(10):1122-8. doi: 10.1002/cbin.10138 [Crossref]
9. Han SM, Han SH, Coh YR, Jang G, Chan Ra J, Kang SK. Enhanced proliferation and differentiation of Oct4- and Sox2-overexpressing human adipose tissue mesenchymal stem cells. Exp Mol Med 2014; 46(6):e101. doi: 10.1038/emm.2014.28 [Crossref]
10. Rodgers K, Jadhav SS. The application of mesenchymal stem cells to treat thermal and radiation burns. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2018; 123:75-81. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2017.10.003 [Crossref]
11. Ball SG, Shuttleworth CA, Kielty CM. Mesenchymal stem cells and neovascularization: role of platelet-derived growth factor receptors. J Cell Mol Med 2007; 11(5):1012-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2007.00120.x [Crossref]
12. Caplan AI, Dennis JE. Mesenchymal stem cells as trophic mediators. J Cell Biochem 2006; 98(5):1076-84. doi: 10.1002/jcb.20886 [Crossref]
13. Choe G, Kim SW, Park J, Park J, Kim S, Kim YS. Anti-oxidant activity reinforced reduced graphene oxide/alginate microgels: mesenchymal stem cell encapsulation and regeneration of infarcted hearts. Biomaterials 2019; 225:119513. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119513 [Crossref]
14. Valle-Prieto A, Conget PA. Human mesenchymal stem cells efficiently manage oxidative stress. Stem Cells Dev 2010; 19(12):1885-93. doi: 10.1089/scd.2010.0093 [Crossref]
15. Mohammadzadeh M, Halabian R, Gharehbaghian A, Amirizadeh N, Jahanian-Najafabadi A, Roushandeh AM. Nrf-2 overexpression in mesenchymal stem cells reduces oxidative stress-induced apoptosis and cytotoxicity. Cell Stress Chaperones 2012; 17(5):553-65. doi: 10.1007/s12192-012-0331-9 [Crossref]
16. Toma C, Pittenger MF, Cahill KS, Byrne BJ, Kessler PD. Human mesenchymal stem cells differentiate to a cardiomyocyte phenotype in the adult murine heart. Circulation 2002; 105(1):93-8. doi: 10.1161/hc0102.101442 [Crossref]
17. Schäfer M, Werner S. Oxidative stress in normal and impaired wound repair. Pharmacol Res 2008; 58(2):165-71. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2008.06.004 [Crossref]
18. Kureel SK, Mogha P, Khadpekar A, Kumar V, Joshi R, Das S. Soft substrate maintains proliferative and adipogenic differentiation potential of human mesenchymal stem cells on long-term expansion by delaying senescence. Biol Open 2019; 8(4):bio039453. doi: 10.1242/bio.039453 [Crossref]
19. Millán-Rivero JE, Martínez CM, Romecín PA, Aznar-Cervantes SD, Carpes-Ruiz M, Cenis JL. Silk fibroin scaffolds seeded with Wharton’s jelly mesenchymal stem cells enhance re-epithelialization and reduce formation of scar tissue after cutaneous wound healing. Stem Cell Res Ther 2019; 10(1):126. doi: 10.1186/s13287-019-1229-6 [Crossref]
20. Alpízar-Alpízar W, Laerum OD, Illemann M, Ramírez JA, Arias A, Malespín-Bendaña W. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL/Lcn2) is upregulated in gastric mucosa infected with Helicobacter pylori. Virchows Arch 2009; 455(3):225-33. doi: 10.1007/s00428-009-0825-8 [Crossref]
21. Bao G, Clifton M, Hoette TM, Mori K, Deng SX, Qiu A. Iron traffics in circulation bound to a siderocalin (Ngal)-catechol complex. Nat Chem Biol 2010; 6(8):602-9. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.402 [Crossref]
22. Iannetti A, Pacifico F, Acquaviva R, Lavorgna A, Crescenzi E, Vascotto C. The neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), a NF-kappaB-regulated gene, is a survival factor for thyroid neoplastic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008; 105(37):14058-63. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0710846105 [Crossref]
23. Miao Q, Ku AT, Nishino Y, Howard JM, Rao AS, Shaver TM. Tcf3 promotes cell migration and wound repair through regulation of lipocalin 2. Nat Commun 2014; 5:4088. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5088 [Crossref]
24. Raghavan PR. Metadichol® and healthy skin: one approach many possible cures. J Clin Exp Dermatol Res 2018; 9(1):445. doi: 10.4172/2155-9554.1000445 [Crossref]
25. Raghavan PR. Metadichol® induced high levels of vitamin C: case studies. Vitam Miner 2017; 6(4):169. doi: 10.4172/2376-1318.1000169 [Crossref]
26. Raghavan PR. Metadichol, a novel ROR gamma inverse agonist and its applications in psoriasis. J Clin Exp Dermatol Res 2017; 8(6):433. doi: 10.4172/2155-9554.1000433 [Crossref]
27. Raghavan PR. Umbilical cord cells treatment with Metadichol® IRS proteins and GLUT4 expression and implications for diabetes. Stem Cell Res Ther 2018; 8(6):429. doi: 10.4172/2157-7633.1000429 [Crossref]
28. Raghavan PR. Metadichol® a novel agonist of the anti-aging klotho gene in cancer cell lines. J Cancer Sci Ther 2018; 10(11):351-7. doi: 10.4172/1948-5956.1000567 [Crossref]
29. Raghavan PR. Metadichol® and MRSA infections: a case report. J Infect Dis Ther 2017; 5(2):317. doi: 10.4172/2332-0877.1000317 [Crossref]
30. Raghavan PR. Metadichol® and Red Cell Distribution Width (RDW) in CKD patients. J Stem Cell Res Ther 2017; 7(7):392. doi: 10.4172/2157-7633.1000392 [Crossref]
31. Alijani-Ghazyani Z, Sabzevari R, Mohammadi Roushandeh A, Jahanian-Najafabadi A, Amiri F, Habibi Roudkenar M. Transplantation of umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing lipocalin 2 ameliorates ischemia-induced injury and reduces apoptotic death in a rat acute myocardial infarction model. Stem Cell Rev Rep 2020; 16(5):968-78. doi: 10.1007/s12015-020-10007-8 [Crossref]
32. Gill R, Poojar B, Bairy LK, Praveen KSE. Comparative evaluation of wound healing potential of manuka and acacia honey in diabetic and nondiabetic rats. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2019; 11(2):116-26. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_257_18 [Crossref]
33. Ganguly P, El-Jawhari JJ, Giannoudis PV, Burska AN, Ponchel F, Jones EA. Age-related changes in bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells: a potential impact on osteoporosis and osteoarthritis development. Cell Transplant 2017; 26(9):1520-9. doi: 10.1177/0963689717721201 [Crossref]
34. Zhang S, Chen L, Zhang G, Zhang B. Umbilical cord-matrix stem cells induce the functional restoration of vascular endothelial cells and enhance skin wound healing in diabetic mice via the polarized macrophages. Stem Cell Res Ther 2020; 11(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s13287-020-1561-x [Crossref]
35. Mastrolia I, Foppiani EM, Murgia A, Candini O, Samarelli AV, Grisendi G. Challenges in clinical development of mesenchymal stromal/stem cells: concise review. Stem Cells Transl Med 2019; 8(11):1135-48. doi: 10.1002/sctm.19-0044 [Crossref]
36. Zhao Q, Ren H, Han Z. Mesenchymal stem cells: Immunomodulatory capability and clinical potential in immune diseases. J Cell Immunother 2016; 2(1):3-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jocit.2014.12.001 [Crossref]
37. Kim H, Choi K, Kweon OK, Kim WH. Enhanced wound healing effect of canine adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells with low-level laser therapy in athymic mice. J Dermatol Sci 2012; 68(3):149-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2012.09.013 [Crossref]
38. Nie C, Yang D, Xu J, Si Z, Jin X, Zhang J. Locally administered adipose-derived stem cells accelerate wound healing through differentiation and vasculogenesis. Cell Transplant 2011; 20(2):205-16. doi: 10.3727/096368910x520065 [Crossref]
39. Wu Y, Chen L, Scott PG, Tredget EE. Mesenchymal stem cells enhance wound healing through differentiation and angiogenesis. Stem Cells 2007; 25(10):2648-59. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0226 [Crossref]
40. Dong Y, A S, Rodrigues M, Li X, Kwon SH, Kosaric N. Injectable and tunable gelatin hydrogels enhance stem cell retention and improve cutaneous wound healing. Adv Funct Mater 2017; 27(24):1606619. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201606619 [Crossref]
41. Xu Q, A S, Gao Y, Guo L, Creagh-Flynn J, Zhou D. A hybrid injectable hydrogel from hyperbranched PEG macromer as a stem cell delivery and retention platform for diabetic wound healing. Acta Biomater 2018; 75:63-74. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.05.039 [Crossref]
42. Bao P, Kodra A, Tomic-Canic M, Golinko MS, Ehrlich HP, Brem H. The role of vascular endothelial growth factor in wound healing. J Surg Res 2009; 153(2):347-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.04.023 [Crossref]
43. Sabzevari R, Mohammadi Roushandeh A, Mehdipour A, Alini M, Habibi Roudkenar M. SA/G hydrogel containing hCAP-18/LL-37-engineered WJ-MSCs-derived conditioned medium promoted wound healing in rat model of excision injury. Life Sci 2020; 261:118381. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118381 [Crossref]
44. Wang W, Yan X, Lin Y, Ge H, Tan Q. Wnt7a promotes wound healing by regulation of angiogenesis and inflammation: Issues on diabetes and obesity. J Dermatol Sci 2018. 10.1016/j.jdermsci.2018.02.007
45. Yue C, Guo Z, Luo Y, Yuan J, Wan X, Mo Z. c-Jun overexpression accelerates wound healing in diabetic rats by human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells Int 2020; 2020:7430968. doi: 10.1155/2020/7430968 [Crossref]
46. Harder J, Schröder JM. Antimicrobial peptides in human skin. Chem Immunol Allergy 2005; 86:22-41. doi: 10.1159/000086650 [Crossref]
47. Xiao X, Yeoh BS, Vijay-Kumar M. Lipocalin 2: an emerging player in iron homeostasis and inflammation. Annu Rev Nutr 2017; 37:103-30. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071816-064559 [Crossref]
48. Nguyen VT, Farman N, Palacios-Ramirez R, Sbeih M, Behar-Cohen F, Aractingi S, et al. Cutaneous wound healing in diabetic mice is improved by topical mineralocorticoid receptor blockade. J Invest Dermatol 2020;140(1):223-34.e7. 10.1016/j.jid.2019.04.030
49. Wlian L, Carrijo-Carvalho LC, Andrade SA. Lourenço SV, Rodrigues CJ. wound healing effects of a lipocalin-derived peptide. J Clin Toxicol 2014; 4(2):187. doi: 10.4172/2161-0495.187 [Crossref]