Logo-apb

Submitted: 03 Nov 2024
Revised: 25 Jul 2025
Accepted: 27 Aug 2025
First published online: 03 Sep 2025
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - FireFox Plugin)

Abstract View: 901
PDF Download: 686
Full Text View: 19
Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin. 15(3):477-478. doi: 10.34172/apb.025.43917

Letter to Editor

Metformin as a Metabolic Adjuvant to Amoxicillin: A Hypothesis on Synergistic Antibacterial Action

Maher Monir. Akl Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, 1, * ORCID logo
Amr Ahmed Supervision, Writing – review & editing, 2 ORCID logo

Author information:
1Faculty of Medicine, Novosibirsk State University, Novosibirsk, Russia
2The Public Health Department, Riyadh First Health Cluster, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

*Corresponding Author: Maher Monir. Akl, Email: maherakl555@gmail.com

Copyright and License Information

© 2025 The Author (s).
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, as long as the original authors and source are cited. No permission is required from the authors or the publishers.

Funding Statement

No financial support was received for this study.

To Editor,

Antibiotic resistance, driven by bacterial adaptability through genetic mutations and horizontal gene transfer, poses a critical global health challenge.1 Bacteria employ diverse resistance mechanisms, including beta-lactamase production, altered penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs), reduced membrane permeability, and efflux pumps, which lead to multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains.2,3 These mechanisms increase mortality, prolong hospital stays, and raise healthcare costs, highlighting the urgent need for innovative strategies to enhance antibiotic efficacy and curb resistance.4

Amoxicillin, a broad-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotic, inhibits bacterial cell wall synthesis by targeting PBPs, resulting in osmotic instability and cell lysis.5 It is effective against pathogens such as Streptococcus spp., Staphylococcus spp., Escherichia coli, and Haemophilus influenzae.5 However, resistance primarily through beta-lactamase enzymes that hydrolyze the beta-lactam ring, along with biofilms that limit antibiotic penetration compromises its effectiveness.6,7 Combining amoxicillin with beta-lactamase inhibitors like clavulanic acid can partially restore its activity, yet novel adjuvants remain essential to overcome complex resistance mechanisms.8


Hypothesis

We propose that metformin, traditionally used for glucose regulation, may serve as an adjuvant to amoxicillin, enhancing its antibacterial efficacy and potentially reducing resistance development through metabolic restriction and immunomodulation. While metformin lacks direct antibacterial action, its effects on host metabolism and immune responses may create an unfavorable environment for bacterial survival, thereby complementing amoxicillin’s bactericidal effect.


Molecular mechanisms of metformin’s adjuvant potential

Metformin activates AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), a central regulator of cellular energy homeostasis.9 AMPK activation shifts metabolism toward lipid oxidation and reduces glucose availability, particularly in inflamed tissues where bacteria exploit nutrient-rich conditions.10 This metabolic restriction may stress bacterial energy production, increasing susceptibility to amoxicillin’s cell wall-targeting effects.11 Additionally, metformin inhibits the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, reducing excessive immune cell proliferation and oxidative stress, which can otherwise promote bacterial adaptation.12

Metformin also exerts immunomodulatory effects. By modulating the Treg/Th17 balance, it promotes anti-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-10, TGF-β) and suppresses pro-inflammatory mediators (e.g., IL-6, IL-17).13 This shift reduces inflammation-driven nutrient and oxygen influx, limiting bacterial proliferation and enhancing biofilm disruption.14 By stabilizing the immune environment, metformin may decrease selective pressure for resistance mutations, supporting amoxicillin’s efficacy.


Proposed synergy

Metformin’s metabolic and immunological effects may amplify amoxicillin’s bactericidal action by creating an inhospitable environment for bacteria. Reduced glucose availability and inflammation hinder bacterial growth, while amoxicillin disrupts cell wall synthesis. This dual strategy could lower the necessary amoxicillin dose, thereby reducing side effects and resistance risk. Given metformin’s well-documented safety profile, it represents a promising candidate as an antibiotic adjuvant, though clinical dose optimization is required.15


Therapeutic considerations

For clinical application, metformin dosing may begin at 500 mg daily, titrated to 1,000–1,500 mg based on tolerance, aligning with its therapeutic range for AMPK activation.15 Amoxicillin dosing (500–1,000 mg every 8–12 hours) should follow standard infection-specific guidelines.5 Regular monitoring of kidney and liver function, glucose, and lactate levels is necessary to prevent complications such as lactic acidosis, particularly when metformin doses exceed 2,000 mg daily.15 Further preclinical and clinical studies are needed to validate this synergy and assess metformin’s role in non-diabetic patients.


Conclusion

We propose that co-administering metformin with amoxicillin could be a promising strategy to enhance antibiotic efficacy and mitigate resistance. Through metabolic restriction and immunomodulation via AMPK and mTOR pathways, combined with amoxicillin’s established bactericidal mechanism, this approach may improve treatment outcomes against MDR pathogens. Further research is essential to substantiate this hypothesis and optimize combination protocols.


Competing Interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


Ethical Approval

Not applicable.


Acknowledgements

We extend our gratitude to researchers worldwide fighting antibiotic resistance and dedicate this work to those who support scientific innovation.


References

  1. Mancuso G, Midiri A, Gerace E, Biondo C. Bacterial antibiotic resistance: the most critical pathogens. Pathogens 2021; 10(10):1310. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10101310 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  2. Reygaert WC. An overview of the antimicrobial resistance mechanisms of bacteria. AIMS Microbiol 2018; 4(3):482-501. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2018.3.482 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  3. Salam MA, Al-Amin MY, Salam MT, Pawar JS, Akhter N, Rabaan AA. Antimicrobial resistance: a growing serious threat for global public health. Healthcare 2023; 11(13):1946. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11131946 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  4. Majumder MAA, Rahman S, Cohall D, Bharatha A, Singh K, Haque M. Antimicrobial stewardship: fighting antimicrobial resistance and protecting global public health. Infect Drug Resist 2020; 13:4713-38. doi: 10.2147/idr.S290835 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  5. Akhavan BJ, Khanna NR, Vijhani P. Amoxicillin. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2025. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482250/.
  6. Tooke CL, Hinchliffe P, Bragginton EC, Colenso CK, Hirvonen VHA, Takebayashi Y. β-lactamases and β-lactamase inhibitors in the 21st century. J Mol Biol 2019; 431(18):3472-500. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.04.002 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  7. Sharma S, Mohler J, Mahajan SD, Schwartz SA, Bruggemann L, Aalinkeel R. Microbial biofilm: a review on formation, infection, antibiotic resistance, control measures, and innovative treatment. Microorganisms 2023; 11(6):1614. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11061614 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  8. Zhang S, Liao X, Ding T, Ahn J. Role of β-lactamase inhibitors as potentiators in antimicrobial chemotherapy targeting gram-negative bacteria. Antibiotics (Basel) 2024; 13(3):260. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics13030260 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  9. Zhou G, Myers R, Li Y, Chen Y, Shen X, Fenyk-Melody J. Role of AMP-activated protein kinase in mechanism of metformin action. J Clin Invest 2001; 108(8):1167-74. doi: 10.1172/jci13505 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  10. Galdieri L, Gatla H, Vancurova I, Vancura A. Activation of AMP-activated protein kinase by metformin induces protein acetylation in prostate and ovarian cancer cells. J Biol Chem 2016; 291(48):25154-66. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M116.742247 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  11. Masadeh MM, Alzoubi KH, Masadeh MM, Aburashed ZO. Metformin as a potential adjuvant antimicrobial agent against multidrug resistant bacteria. Clin Pharmacol 2021; 13:83-90. doi: 10.2147/cpaa.S297903 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  12. Zhao HW, Zhou N, Jin F, Wang R, Zhao JQ. Metformin reduces pancreatic cancer cell proliferation and increases apoptosis through MTOR signaling pathway and its dose-effect relationship. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2020; 24(10):5336-44. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202005_21316 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  13. Duan W, Ding Y, Yu X, Ma D, Yang B, Li Y. Metformin mitigates autoimmune insulitis by inhibiting Th1 and Th17 responses while promoting Treg production. Am J Transl Res 2019; 11(4):2393-402. [ Google Scholar]
  14. Moon J, Lee SY, Choi JW, Lee AR, Yoo JH, Moon SJ. Metformin ameliorates scleroderma via inhibiting Th17 cells and reducing mTOR-STAT3 signaling in skin fibroblasts. J Transl Med 2021; 19(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12967-021-02860-z [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]
  15. Kuan IH, Wilson LC, Leishman JC, Cosgrove S, Walker RJ, Putt TL. Metformin doses to ensure efficacy and safety in patients with reduced kidney function. PLoS One 2021; 16(2):e0246247. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246247 [Crossref] [ Google Scholar]