Logo-apb
Submitted: 03 Aug 2025
Revision: 10 Sep 2025
Accepted: 25 Sep 2025
ePublished: 21 Oct 2025
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

Adv Pharm Bull. Inpress.
doi: 10.34172/apb.025.46124
  Abstract View: 44

Original Article

The Effect of Glycosylation on Biodistribution and Cytotoxicity of 99mTc-radiolabeled Luteolin

Mostafa Pirali Hamedani ORCID logo, Mohammad Seyedhamzeh ORCID logo, Mohammad H. Ghahremani ORCID logo, Abbas Hadjiakhoondi ORCID logo, Morteza Pirali Hamedani ORCID logo, Mehdi Shafiee Ardestani ORCID logo, Zahra Tofighi* ORCID logo
*Corresponding Author: Email: z.tofighi@tums.ac.ir

Abstract

Purpose: Luteolin (Lu) and its glycosylated derivative, luteolin-7-O-glucoside (LuG), are the main bioactive flavonoids reported in the Scutellaria genus. Still, in vivo biodistribution and cytotoxic effects on cancer cells remain unrevealed. This study investigated the biodistribution and cytotoxic effects of Lu and LuG on cancer cell lines, particularly hepatic carcinoma (HepG2). Methods: Lu and LuG were isolated from S. pinnatifida extracts, and the structures were confirmed by ¹H-NMR spectroscopy. Radiolabeling was performed to assess their biodistribution in Wistar-Albino rats using SPECT imaging and organ radioactivity was measured. Organs were harvested and radioactivity quantified to determine tissue accumulation. Cytotoxicity was evaluated via MTT assay on normal (HUVEC) and cancer (HepG2, SW480) cell lines. Flow cytometry analyzed apoptosis/necrosis and cell cycle arrest after treatment. Results: LuG exhibited preferential accumulation in the liver (~28.7%) and significant cytotoxicity on HepG2 cells. Flow cytometry indicated non-apoptotic cell death and G1/S phase cell cycle arrest in HepG2 cells treated with LuG, whereas Lu showed less accumulation and cytotoxicity. Biodistribution data revealed lower accumulation in other organs, and LuG had negligible toxicity on non-hepatic cells (HUVEC, SW480). Overall biodistribution analysis revealed lower off-target accumulation, further supporting the hepatic selectivity of LuG. Conclusion: This study provides the first integrated evidence of the liver-targeted biodistribution and selective anticancer effects of LuG. These findings demonstrate LuG as a candidate therapeutic for hepatocellular carcinoma. These results emphasize the importance of pharmacological evaluation of flavonoid glycosides and support preclinical development of LuG as a targeted anticancer agent.
First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 44

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


PDF Download: 0

Your browser does not support the canvas element.